Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24

* Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:

> I haven't tested it recently . This was on an older version of RT 
> though . I could try it if it's interesting ? Or do you think it's 
> already fixed?

it would be definitely interesting to see how robust the latest IO-APIC 
code is.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
    • From: Karsten Wiese <[email protected]>
  • Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] s390: fadvise hint values.
• Next by Date: Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
• Previous by thread: Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
• Next by thread: Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]