RVK wrote:
Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 15:36 +0530, RVK wrote:
bits/pthreadtypes.h:150:typedef unsigned long int pthread_t;
That's an implementation detail which you cannot determine any
information from.
What Arjan is saying is that pthread_t is a cookie -- this means that
you cannot interpret it in any way, it is just a "thing" which you can
pass back to the API, that pthread_t happens to be typedef'd to unsigned
long int is irrelevant.
Do you want to say for both 2.6.x and 2.4.x I should interpret that way ?
rvk
Indeed, for ANY OS using pthreads it should be interpreted that way..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |