Re: [PATCH] [5/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 350-workthreads.patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > Again, why do you think you need this?
> 
> 1. If something should be wrong with the freezer, it forms part of a
> safety net that stops your data on disk being trashed.

> 2. Separating out threads doing syncing from threads submitting I/O
> makes the refrigerator much more reliable, even under extreme load.

This seems to be red herring. Sometimes sync took way too long (like
hours) with older kernels and reiserfs, but I believe that has been
fixed. If not, we need to fix it, anyway; no need to work around it in
suspend2.
								Pavel
-- 
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux