Re: [PATCH] [5/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 350-workthreads.patch

Hi.

On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 09:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Again, why do you think you need this?

1. If something should be wrong with the freezer, it forms part of a
safety net that stops your data on disk being trashed.
2. Separating out threads doing syncing from threads submitting I/O
makes the refrigerator much more reliable, even under extreme load.

Regards,

Nigel
-- 
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] [5/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 350-workthreads.patch
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] [5/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 350-workthreads.patch
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [5/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 350-workthreads.patch
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12
• Next by Date: Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [5/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 350-workthreads.patch
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [5/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 350-workthreads.patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]