On Maw, 2005-07-05 at 20:14, Jens Axboe wrote: > IDE still has much lower overhead per command than your average SCSI > hardware. SATA with FIS even improves on this, definitely a good thing! But SCSI overlaps them while in PATA they are dead time. Thats why PATA is so demanding of large I/O block sizes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: [git patches] IDE update
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 12/27] Eliminate MAD cache leak associated with local completions
- Next by Date: [PATCH 13/27] Add ib_modify_mad API to MAD
- Previous by thread: Re: [git patches] IDE update
- Next by thread: Re: [git patches] IDE update
- Index(es):
