Re: [git patches] IDE update

On Maw, 2005-07-05 at 20:14, Jens Axboe wrote:
> IDE still has much lower overhead per command than your average SCSI
> hardware. SATA with FIS even improves on this, definitely a good thing!

But SCSI overlaps them while in PATA they are dead time. Thats why PATA
is so demanding of large I/O block sizes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 12/27] Eliminate MAD cache leak associated with local completions
• Next by Date: [PATCH 13/27] Add ib_modify_mad API to MAD
• Previous by thread: Re: [git patches] IDE update
• Next by thread: Re: [git patches] IDE update
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]