Jim Crilly wrote: > but SGI doesn't release a new filesystem every 3 years with the > desire to remove and replace the old one. Read Han's reply to Ed T. nearby. This is why I should have followed my own original intent and not gotten back into this flamefest, as this response is the same kind of bullshit that's been repeated over and over again. My mistake, won't happen again. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
- From: Jim Crilly <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
- References:
- Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
- From: Horst von Brand <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
- From: Ed Tomlinson <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
- From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
- From: Jim Crilly <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
- From: Ed Cogburn <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
- From: Jim Crilly <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
- Prev by Date: [patch 2.6.13-rc2] all archs: add "__slow" tag for slow code
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
- Previous by thread: Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
- Next by thread: Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
- Index(es):
