Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 21:15 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 07:31:04PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 19:05 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> writes:
> > > >  
> > > > +static void force_sig_info_fault(int si_signo, int si_code,
> > > > +				 unsigned long address, struct task_struct *tsk)
> > > 
> > > This won't work with a unit-at-a-time compiler which happily
> > > inlines everything static with only a single caller. Use noinline
> > 
> > but.... the x86 kernel is -fno-unit-at-a-time.... for stack reasons ;)
> 
> The gcc people are making noises of removing that. So eventually
> it will need to go.

the gcc people also fixed the stack usage on inlining (at least this
specific class) in CVS HEAD so the "problem" is a lot smaller whenever
they make it go away.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux