On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 21:15 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 07:31:04PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 19:05 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> writes:
> > > >
> > > > +static void force_sig_info_fault(int si_signo, int si_code,
> > > > + unsigned long address, struct task_struct *tsk)
> > >
> > > This won't work with a unit-at-a-time compiler which happily
> > > inlines everything static with only a single caller. Use noinline
> >
> > but.... the x86 kernel is -fno-unit-at-a-time.... for stack reasons ;)
>
> The gcc people are making noises of removing that. So eventually
> it will need to go.
the gcc people also fixed the stack usage on inlining (at least this
specific class) in CVS HEAD so the "problem" is a lot smaller whenever
they make it go away.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|