Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86

On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 19:05 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> writes:
> >  
> > +static void force_sig_info_fault(int si_signo, int si_code,
> > +				 unsigned long address, struct task_struct *tsk)
> 
> This won't work with a unit-at-a-time compiler which happily
> inlines everything static with only a single caller. Use noinline

but.... the x86 kernel is -fno-unit-at-a-time.... for stack reasons ;)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, part 4
• Next by Date: Re: linux-kernel Cannot determine dependencies of module piix
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]