Re: [git patches] IDE update

* Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:

> But! I used hdparm -t solely, 2.6 was always ~5% faster than 2.4. But 
> using -Tt slowed down the hd speed by about 30%. So it looks like some 
> scheduler interaction, perhaps the memory timing loops gets it marked 
> as batch or something?

to check whether that could be the case, could you try:

	nice -n -20 hdparm -t /dev/hdc

does that produce different results?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Grant Coady <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Grant Coady <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [git patches] IDE update
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: GIT tree broken?
• Next by Date: [RFC PATCH 0/8] shared subtree
• Previous by thread: RE: [git patches] IDE update
• Next by thread: Re: [git patches] IDE update
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]