Re: realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-11 glitches [no more]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Rui Nuno Capela <[email protected]> wrote:

> OK.
> 
> Just for the heads up, here goes todays summary results regarding my 
> jack_test4.2 test suite against 2.6.12 kernels configured with 
> PREEMPT_RT, but... now with 99.9% certainty :)

thanks for the testing!

>   ------------------------------ ------------- -------------
>                                  RT-V0.7.51-13 RT-V0.7.49-01
>   ------------------------------ ------------- -------------

>   Delay Maximum . . . . . . . . :      333           295     usecs
>   Cycle Maximum . . . . . . . . :      970           943     usecs
>   Average DSP Load. . . . . . . :       45.7          44.4   %
>   Average CPU System Load . . . :       15.6          16.3   %
>   Average CPU User Load . . . . :       32.0          30.1   %

i'm wondering - is this slight increase in CPU utilization (and 
latencies) due to natural fluctuations, or is it a genuine overhead 
increase?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux