> > [foo@liltux /]$ cat /etc/shadow > > cat: /etc/shadow: Permission denied > > Additionally, the apps would need to either be rewritten to create > the files under the audited context, or policy would have to cause all > files created by those apps to be under the audited context. Neither > one of those options is satisfactory why not? If your /etc/shadow has no selinux context you've lost already :0 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
- From: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
- References:
- [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
- From: "Timothy R. Chavez" <tinytim@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
- From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
- From: "Timothy R. Chavez" <tinytim@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
- From: serue@us.ibm.com
- [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
- Prev by Date: Re: speedstep-centrino on dothan
- Next by Date: Re: Synaptics Touchpad not detected in 2.6.13-rc2
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
- Index(es):
