Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name

On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:48 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:

> Tim's code lets you say I want change notification to this file only. The 
> notification follows the audit format with all relavant pieces of information 
> gathered at the time of the event and serialized with all other events.

well can't you sort of do that based on (selinux) security context of
the file already? after all that's part of the inode already. Isn't that
finegrained enough?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
    • From: "Timothy R. Chavez" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
    • From: "Timothy R. Chavez" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
    • From: Steve Grubb <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
    • From: Steve Grubb <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [patch 1/4] drivers/char/ip2/i2lib.c: replace direct assignment with set_current_state()
• Next by Date: [patch 1/4] fix sparse warnings
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]