Hi.
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 04:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, 7 of July 2005 14:49, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > >> Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing
> > >> it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning.
> > >
> > > I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to
> > > ram - just the suspend to disk part.
> >
> > Right, so you support the resume from disk trigger in sysfs and the
> > /proc/acpi/sleep interface? If suspend2 is a complete dropin replacement
> > then I'm much happier with the idea of dropping swsusp, but I don't want
> > to have to tie suspend/resume scripts to kernel versions.
>
> I don't think that swsusp can be replaced with suspend2 right now. First,
> swsusp works on x86-64, and the support in suspend2 is preliminary,
> AFAIK. Second, the IA64 support for swsusp is in the works, and it is not supported
> by suspend2.
>
> Please don't plan to drop swsusp until you are able to replace it _completely_.
Fair enough. I didn't realise Pavel had IA64 support too :>
Nigel
--
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |