Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing
>> it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning.
>
> I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to
> ram - just the suspend to disk part.
Right, so you support the resume from disk trigger in sysfs and the
/proc/acpi/sleep interface? If suspend2 is a complete dropin replacement
then I'm much happier with the idea of dropping swsusp, but I don't want
to have to tie suspend/resume scripts to kernel versions.
--
Matthew Garrett | [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |