Re: [RFC] Atmel-supplied hardware headers for AT91RM9200 SoC processor

On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 11:58 +0200, Andrew Victor wrote:
> +// -  Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
> +// this list of conditions and the disclaimer below in the documentation and/or
> +// other materials provided with the distribution.

Is that for real?

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC] Atmel-supplied hardware headers for AT91RM9200 SoC processor
    • From: Andrew Victor <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC] Atmel-supplied hardware headers for AT91RM9200 SoC processor
    • From: Andrew Victor <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: IBM HDAPS things are looking up (was: Re: [Hdaps-devel] Re: [ltp] IBM HDAPS Someone interested? (Accelerometer))
• Next by Date: Re: page allocation/attributes question (i386/x86_64 specific)
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Atmel-supplied hardware headers for AT91RM9200 SoC processor
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Atmel-supplied hardware headers for AT91RM9200 SoC processor
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]