* Alistair John Strachan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > great! Do the softlockup warnings still occur?
>
> Yes, but in no greater a number.
could you apply the patch below, so that we can see what kind of time
gap the softlockup detector encountered?
Ingo
Index: linux/kernel/softlockup.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ linux/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
per_cpu(print_timestamp, this_cpu) = timestamp;
spin_lock(&print_lock);
- printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#%d!\n",
- this_cpu);
+ printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#%d! %ld-%ld\n",
+ this_cpu, jiffies, timestamp);
dump_stack();
#if defined(__i386__) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
nmi_show_all_regs();
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |