On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 02:53:17PM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> It might be worth thinking about a more general securityfs as part of LSM,
> to be used by stacker and LSM modules. SELinux could use this instead of
> managing its own selinuxfs.
Good idea. In the case of stacked modules each with a custom fs, having them
be part of a common hierarchy makes a lot of sense.
I'm assuming you are advocating for adding LSM support to provide some level
of consistency in presentation rather than it _just_ being a new mount point
for every module to live under?
Take the discussion to the LSM list?
Thanks!
Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |