On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Tony Jones wrote:
> There just isn't enough content to justify a stacker specific filesystem IMHO.
It might be worth thinking about a more general securityfs as part of LSM,
to be used by stacker and LSM modules. SELinux could use this instead of
managing its own selinuxfs.
- James
--
James Morris
<[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |