On Sunday 03 July 2005 17:14, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 7/3/05, Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This patch makes mdelay/udelay/ndelay calls as small
> > as possible (just a function call), uses macros which
> > do compile-time checks on delay duration if parameter
> > is a constant, otherwise check is done at run time
> > to prevent udelay(-1) disasters.
> >
> [snip]
>
> >
> > -#define ndelay(n) udelay((n) * 5)
> > +//BOGUS! #define ndelay(n) udelay((n) * 5)
> >
> If it's bogus, why not just remove it instead of leaving it in as a
> comment (and a C++ style comment at that) ?
I wanted to draw attention of someone who knows what's going on.
Can be removed altogether instead.
> [snip]
> > +//extern struct timer_opts* timer;
>
> Why add this at all if you are just going to comment it out anyway?
Sorry, this is a leftover meant to be deleted.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]