Re: [PATCH] all-arch delay functions take 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 03 July 2005 17:14, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 7/3/05, Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > This patch makes mdelay/udelay/ndelay calls as small
> > as possible (just a function call), uses macros which
> > do compile-time checks on delay duration if parameter
> > is a constant, otherwise check is done at run time
> > to prevent udelay(-1) disasters.
> > 
> [snip]
> 
> > 
> > -#define ndelay(n)      udelay((n) * 5)
> > +//BOGUS! #define ndelay(n)     udelay((n) * 5)
> > 
> If it's bogus, why not just remove it instead of leaving it in as a
> comment (and a C++ style comment at that) ?

I wanted to draw attention of someone who knows what's going on.
Can be removed altogether instead.
 
> [snip]
> > +//extern struct timer_opts* timer;
> 
> Why add this at all if you are just going to comment it out anyway?

Sorry, this is a leftover meant to be deleted.
--
vda

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux