On Saturday 02 July 2005 02:06, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Blaisorblade <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Friday 01 July 2005 23:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well I can fix the reject if we decide that
> uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is not to be applied, but
> it seems that there's no need.
> > However, for now it seems that I can't reproduce anyway the iptables
> > crash, and even Jeff did some testing... so it seems it's ok.
> OK..
> Now what about uml-remove-winch-sem.patch? I have a "keep this in -mm"
> sign next to it.
Well, wait a bit for that... I'll be publishing that out in my patchset, so
we'll get wider testing.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |