Blaisorblade <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 01 July 2005 23:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Jeff Dike <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > This patch implements something very close to skas mode for hosts
> > > which don't support skas - I'm calling this skas0.
> >
> > I note that this patch assumes that
> > uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is applied.
>
> You're fixing the conflict anyway since it's little, correct?
Well I can fix the reject if we decide that
uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is not to be applied, but
it seems that there's no need.
> However, for now it seems that I can't reproduce anyway the iptables crash,
> and even Jeff did some testing... so it seems it's ok.
OK..
Now what about uml-remove-winch-sem.patch? I have a "keep this in -mm"
sign next to it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |