Re: FUSE merging?

> Could this be solved by implementing some sort of (optional) timeout on fuse
> syscalls (in request_send)?

Yes, but that would be thousand times worse than the current solution.
You just can't know in advance, what a "sane" timeout value is.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: FUSE merging?
    • From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
  • Re: FUSE merging?
    • From: Frederik Deweerdt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: setitimer expire too early (Kernel 2.4)
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/1] sizeof(*dev) : arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
• Previous by thread: Re: FUSE merging?
• Next by thread: Re: FUSE merging?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]