On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:39 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> Thus, the right thing to do might be to split up the
> struct pci_dev->suspend() and pci_dev->resume() calls into
>
> suspend()
> poweroff()
> poweron()
> resume()
No. There are very good reasons not to do that split at the pci_dev
level.
> and then have the generic pci error recovery routines call
> suspend/resume only, skipping the poweroff-on calls. Does that
> sound good?
>
> I'm not sure I can pull this off without having someone from
> the power-management world throw a brick at me.
Just keep the error recovery callbacks for now, and we might be able to
provide a generic "helper" doing the watchdog thing (yes, there is a
watchdog in the net core)
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |