On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:07:59 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dunnersdag 30 Juni 2005 03:13, [email protected] wrote: > > > From: Chris Zankel <[email protected]> > > > > I noticed this because I was doing some more ipc cleanups and I did the > > original errno and ipc cleanups for other architectures, so it stuck out. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Zankel <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > > Actually, it would be better not to have sys_ipc or include/asm-xtensa/ipc.h > at all but rather have all ipc syscalls as separate entry points. Absolutely true and I think the patch xtensa-remove-old-syscalls.patch that is in -mm also gets rid of sys_ipc. If that is the case, then include/asm-xtensa/ipc.h can, indeed, be completely removed. > IIRC, parisc is the only architecture to get this right so far, so please > have a look there. alpha, x86_64 also has this done. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [email protected] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgp53IjTmqc1t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Prev by Date: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Next by Date: Re: PCI Power management (was: Re: [PATCH 4/13]: PCI Err: e100 ethernet driver recovery
- Previous by thread: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (dropped patches?)
- Next by thread: Re: PCI Power management (was: Re: [PATCH 4/13]: PCI Err: e100 ethernet driver recovery
- Index(es):
