Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice

[Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>]

Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:43, Peter Williams wrote:
>
> > Con Kolivas wrote:
> >
> > > This patch improves throughput with the smp nice balancing code. Many
> > > thanks to Martin Bligh for the usage of his regression testing bed to
> > > confirm the effectiveness of various patches.
> >
> > Con,
> > 	This doesn't build on non SMP systems due to the migration_thread field
> > only being defined for SMP.  Attached is a copy of a slightly modified
> > PlugSched version of the patch which I used to fix the problem in
> > PlugSched.  Even though it's for a different file it should be easy to
> > copy over.
>
>
> Peter
>
> Look at the actual patch I sent out you'll see it moved the ifdefs up to 
> compensate. I believe your port of my patch doesn't build and I suspect it's 
> because you missed these ifdef movements ;)

Yes, I should have read the patch more carefully.

Sorry about that,
Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/