On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:43, Peter Williams wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > > This patch improves throughput with the smp nice balancing code. Many > > thanks to Martin Bligh for the usage of his regression testing bed to > > confirm the effectiveness of various patches. > > Con, > This doesn't build on non SMP systems due to the migration_thread field > only being defined for SMP. Attached is a copy of a slightly modified > PlugSched version of the patch which I used to fix the problem in > PlugSched. Even though it's for a different file it should be easy to > copy over. Peter Look at the actual patch I sent out you'll see it moved the ifdefs up to compensate. I believe your port of my patch doesn't build and I suspect it's because you missed these ifdef movements ;) Cheers, Con
Attachment:
pgpRgx7s4lxc4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
- References:
- [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
- Next by Date: Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
- Index(es):