On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 18:59 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sad, 2005-06-25 at 09:35, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > > BTW2 could it be that somewhere a timeout has been lowered in recent
> > > kernels? That must have been pre-2.6.11 then.
>
> Timeouts have not changed or have increased in fact.
Never mind, the offending harddisk has ceased to be yesterday, it is no
more.
What really bothers me, though, is that until the very last moment it
was alive, it didn't report any smart error, nor did any self test fail.
I guess IBM is to blame here :-(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
