Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 21:32 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > That said, I don't like the reiser name-number style. If you must do
> > > something like this, mark responsibility by using a named identifier
> > > covering the layer in question instead.
> > > 
> > >         assert("trace_hash-89", is_hashed(foo) != 0);
> > 
> > A human readable message would be nicer. For example, "foo was hashed".
> 
> Indeed.

You can just dump the expression (with #argument). That is what
traditional userspace assert did forever.

It won't help for BUG_ON(a || b || c || d || e) but these
are bad style anyways and should be avoided.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux