On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:44:55AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> vs and zam, please comment on what we get from our profiler and spinlock
> debugger that the standard tools don't supply. I am sure you have a
> reason, but now is the time to articulate it.
>
> We would like to keep the disabled code in there until we have a chance
> to prove (or fail to prove) that cycle detection can be resolved
> effectively, and then with a solution in hand argue its merits.
How about the review of your code base? Has reiser4 ever been
fully reviewed by people outside your group?
Normally full review is a requirement for merging.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
