David Masover <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hans Reiser wrote:
[...]
> > Reiser4 plugins are not per user, but per kernel. They are compiled
> > in. The model is intended to ease the development process, nothing
> > more. Apologies if the naming suggests more.
What do you gain by this? It is just a kernel configuration option of
sorts? Just name mangling of existing mechanisms for no good reason at all?
> But, to avoid confusion, the inclusion of a crytocompress plugin in a
> given kernel doesn't mean that all files accessed from that kernel are
> encrypted and compressed. It just means that you can pick an individual
> file and set it to be transparently encrypted/compressed.
>
> That is what I meant by "enabled". Not per-user, but per-file.
Wonderful! I carefully "transparently encrypt" my secret files, so
/everybody/ can read them! Now /that/ is progress!
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
