Re: [PATCH][TRIVIAL] Allocate kprobe_table at runtime

Jeff,

On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:37:29PM +0000, Jeff Sipek wrote:
> Allocates kprobe_table at runtime.
> -	/* FIXME allocate the probe table, currently defined statically */
> +	kprobe_table = kmalloc(sizeof(struct hlist_head)*KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC);

Memory allocation using GFP_KERNEL has more chances of success as compared to
GFP_ATOMIC. Why can't we use GFP_KERNEL here?

Thanks
Prasanna

-- 

Prasanna S Panchamukhi
Linux Technology Center
India Software Labs, IBM Bangalore
Ph: 91-80-25044636
<[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH][TRIVIAL] Allocate kprobe_table at runtime
  - From: Jeff Sipek <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
Next by Date: Re: reiser4 plugins
Previous by thread: [PATCH][TRIVIAL] Allocate kprobe_table at runtime
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][TRIVIAL] Allocate kprobe_table at runtime
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]