Philippe Gerum wrote:
> There's a fourth one (ipipe/x86.c) added by the arch-dependent patch,
> but yes, I agree that this could sound rather overkill to have this
> support in its own dir, especially a top-level one. The files under
> ipipe/ can be built as a loadable module, hence the current layout.
> Would you see this belonging to, e.g., the driver tree instead?
How about this instead:
Arch-indepedent parts:
----------------------
include/linux/ipipe.h
kernel/ipipe/Kconfig (formerly ipipe/Kconfig)
kernel/ipipe/Makefile (formerly ipipe/Makefile)
kernel/ipipe/core.c (formerly kernel/ipipe.c)
kernel/ipipe/generic.c (formerly ipipe/generi.c)
Arch-dependent parts:
---------------------
include/asm-i386/ipipe.h
arch/i386/kernel/ipipe-core.c (formerly arch/i386/kernel/ipipe.c)
arch/i386/kernel/ipipe-root.c (formerly ipipe/x86.c)
Seems to me that the above makes more sense. Albeit you would have
parts of the module in kernel/ipipe/* and the rest in
arch/*/kernel/ipipe*.
Karim
--
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || [email protected] || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]