Re: [PATCH 1/2] I-pipe: Core implementation

Hello,

Pavel Machek wrote:

Hi!

linux-2.6.12-rc6-ipipe-0.5/ipipe/Kconfig         |   12
linux-2.6.12-rc6-ipipe-0.5/ipipe/Makefile        |    9
linux-2.6.12-rc6-ipipe-0.5/ipipe/generic.c       |  265 ++++++++++++

Top-level directory for 3 files seems a bit excessive to me...
				Pavel

There's a fourth one (ipipe/x86.c) added by the arch-dependent patch, but yes, I agree that this could sound rather overkill to have this support in its own dir, especially a top-level one. The files under ipipe/ can be built as a loadable module, hence the current layout.

Would you see this belonging to, e.g., the driver tree instead?

--

Philippe.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] I-pipe: Core implementation
    • From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/2] I-pipe: Core implementation
    • From: Philippe Gerum <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] I-pipe: Core implementation
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Replaces two GOTO statements with one IF_ELSE statement in /fs/open.c
• Next by Date: PATCH: Samsung SN-124 works perfectly well with DMA
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] I-pipe: Core implementation
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] I-pipe: Core implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]