On Sul, 2005-06-19 at 18:55, Pavel Machek wrote: > Actually the day we have rm utf-8-ed, we have a problem. Someone will > create two files that have same utf name, encoded differently, and > will be in trouble. Remember old > \* "hack"? utf-8 makes variation > possible... They are different to POSIX as they are different byte sequences > > If we are serious about utf-8 support in ext3, we should return > -EINVAL if someone passes non-canonical utf-8 string. That would ironically not be standards compliant - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- References:
- A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: Alexey Zaytsev <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: Alexey Zaytsev <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: Patrick McFarland <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.12: connection tracking broken?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Replaces two GOTO statements with one IF_ELSE statement in /fs/open.c
- Previous by thread: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- Next by thread: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- Index(es):
 |