On Monday 13 June 2005 03:20 pm, Alan Cox wrote: > An ext3fs is always utf-8. People might have chosen to put other > encodings on it but thats "not our fault" ;) What happens if you 'field upgrade' ext2 to ext3 by adding a journal? That doesn't magically convert !utf-8 to utf-8. > There are some good technical reasons too > > Encodings don't map 1:1 - two names may cease to be unique Hold up. Unless the original encoding is 'wrong' and has two mapped characters that, in reality, are the same character, no such uniqueness should stop. (This implies the encoding that we switched to 'fixed' said 'bug') > Encodings vary in length - image a file name that is longer than the > allowed maximum on your system with your encoding choice - that could > occur with KOI8-R to UTF-8 I believe Thats a fault of the file system design, not of the encoding. File systems should not have very short filenames. -- Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [email protected] "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989
Attachment:
pgpx5igyc4bt9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- References:
- A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: Alexey Zaytsev <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: Alexey Zaytsev <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing
- Next by Date: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- Previous by thread: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- Next by thread: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- Index(es):
 |