Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()

On Thursday, June 16, 2005 2:01 pm, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:21:50 +0200 (CEST), Jesper Juhl
> >>>>> <[email protected]> said:
>
>   Jesper> I send in the patch below a while back but never recieved
>   Jesper> any response.  Now I'm resending it in the hope that it
>   Jesper> might be added to -mm.  The patch still applies cleanly to
>   Jesper> 2.6.12-rc6-mm1
>
> The patch looks fine to me.

Yep, looks good.  I was the one that introduced this bug.  It's hard to 
hit, but we should still fix it.  Thanks Jesper.

Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()
    • From: David Mosberger <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?
• Next by Date: Re: [ltp] Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?
• Previous by thread: Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()
• Next by thread: Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]