Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()
From: "Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:25:59 +0200
Sender: [email protected]

Jesper wrote:

>> Jesper, are you interested in my stuff
>
>Certainly.
>

Ok, here is the warning level patch for reference. I'm sending the rest of my stuff
to you off-list since it is rather largish and I don't have a working mail client
on this machine.

      Arnd <><

Attachment: warn-levels.diff
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()
  - From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing
Previous by thread: Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()
Next by thread: Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux