Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()

Jesper wrote:

>> Jesper, are you interested in my stuff
>
>Certainly.
>

Ok, here is the warning level patch for reference. I'm sending the rest of my stuff
to you off-list since it is rather largish and I don't have a working mail client
on this machine.

      Arnd <><

Attachment: warn-levels.diff
Description: Binary data

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing
• Previous by thread: Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()
• Next by thread: Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]