Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad?

[Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>]

On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 03:49:33PM -0700, David L wrote:
> [snip]
> >On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 14:59 -0700, David L wrote:
> >> I'm seeing the message:
> >>
> >> bad: scheduling while atomic!
> >>
> >> I see this dozens of times when I'm writing to a nand flash device using 
> >a
> >> vendor-provided driver from Compulab in 2.6.8.1.  Does this mean the 
> >driver
> >> has a bug or is incompatible with the preemptive configuration option?  
> >How
> >> bad is "bad"?  Should I turn of the preemption option, ignore the 
> >message,
> >> or what?
> >
> >can you post the sourcecode of the driver? it needs fixing...
> It's on-line at:
> 
> http://www.compulab.co.il/686-developer.htm
> 
> under "Linux - kernel, drivers and patches".
> 
> After unzipping, it's in:
> 
> Drivers & Patches 2.6/Flash Disk/cl_fdrv.tgz

that's only part of the source though... can you point at the full one ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/