Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[snip]
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 14:59 -0700, David L wrote:
> I'm seeing the message:
>
> bad: scheduling while atomic!
>
> I see this dozens of times when I'm writing to a nand flash device using a > vendor-provided driver from Compulab in 2.6.8.1. Does this mean the driver > has a bug or is incompatible with the preemptive configuration option? How > bad is "bad"? Should I turn of the preemption option, ignore the message,
> or what?

can you post the sourcecode of the driver? it needs fixing...
It's on-line at:

http://www.compulab.co.il/686-developer.htm

under "Linux - kernel, drivers and patches".

After unzipping, it's in:

Drivers & Patches 2.6/Flash Disk/cl_fdrv.tgz

Cheers...

                David

_________________________________________________________________
Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux