Re: [PATCH 1/1] SELinux: memory leak in selinux_sb_copy_data()

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 17:47 +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> Sorry, there was a whitespace accident and the above patch would not
> apply.
> Here is the fixed version:
> 
> diff -pruN linux-2.6-git/security/selinux/hooks.c linux-2.6-git_xxx/security/selinux/hooks.c
> --- linux-2.6-git/security/selinux/hooks.c	2005-06-16 20:01:03.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6-git_xxx/security/selinux/hooks.c	2005-06-17 14:38:08.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1945,6 +1945,7 @@ static int selinux_sb_copy_data(struct f
>  	} while (*in_end++);
>  
>  	copy_page(in_save, nosec_save);
> +	free_page((unsigned long)nosec);
>  out:
>  	return rc;
>  }

Shouldn't that be nosec_save?  nosec is advanced by take_option().

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] SELinux: memory leak in selinux_sb_copy_data()
    • From: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/1] SELinux: memory leak in selinux_sb_copy_data()
    • From: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] SELinux: memory leak in selinux_sb_copy_data()
    • From: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: cfq misbehaving on 2.6.11-1.14_FC3
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] inotify, improved.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] SELinux: memory leak in selinux_sb_copy_data()
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] SELinux: memory leak in selinux_sb_copy_data()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]