Chris Friesen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Chris Friesen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Would a patch that makes it
> >>just return successfully without doing anything be accepted?
> >
> >
> > yup.
>
> Currently tmpfs reuses the simple_dir_operations from libfs.c.
>
> Would it make sense to add the empty fsync() function there, and have
> all other users pick it up as well? Is this likely to break stuff?
Isn't simple_sync_file() suitable?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
