Andrew Morton wrote:
Chris Friesen <[email protected]> wrote:
Would a patch that makes it
just return successfully without doing anything be accepted?
yup.
Currently tmpfs reuses the simple_dir_operations from libfs.c.
Would it make sense to add the empty fsync() function there, and have
all other users pick it up as well? Is this likely to break stuff?
Currently the following code uses simple_dir_operations:
./kernel/cpuset.c
./security/selinux/selinuxfs.c
./ipc/mqueue.c
./include/linux/fs.h
./fs/relayfs/inode.c
./fs/debugfs/inode.c
./fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmfs.c
./fs/autofs/inode.c
./fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
./fs/libfs.c
./fs/ramfs/inode.c
./fs/devpts/inode.c
./net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c
./mm/shmem.c
./drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasmfs.c
./drivers/oprofile/oprofilefs.c
./drivers/isdn/capi/capifs.c
./drivers/usb/core/inode.c
./drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
