Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] Race condition with it_real_fn inkernel/itimer.c

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> Andrew, (or Roland since I see Andrew added you to the list)
> 
>  What do you think? Should try_to_del_timer_sync be brought over to the
> mainline, or have the above ugly code added?

On the other hand, if 2 threads calls do_setitimer() in parallel
they are asking for trouble. So may be it is possible to ignore
this minor problem and stay with your patch?

Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [BUG] Race condition with it_real_fn in kernel/itimer.c
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] Race condition with it_real_fn in kernel/itimer.c
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Re: [BUG] Race condition with it_real_fn in kernel/itimer.c
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] Race condition with it_real_fn in kernel/itimer.c
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] Race condition with it_real_fn in kernel/itimer.c
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: PROBLEM: Devices behind PCI Express-to-PCI bridge not mapped
Next by Date: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] Race condition with it_real_fn in kernel/itimer.c
Next by thread: Re: [BUG] Race condition with it_real_fn in kernel/itimer.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]