Re: [PATCH] Using msleep() instead of HZ

Luca Falavigna wrote:

Hi Andrew,
Ingo suggested me to forward you my patches which do use of msleep in order to
perform short delays instead of using HZ directly.
I already sent him some, but they are against his -RT tree.
This is a modified patch, built against 2.6.12-rc6.

Signed-off by: Luca Falavigna <[email protected]>


ACK


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Using msleep() instead of HZ
  - From: Luca Falavigna <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
Next by Date: Re: RFC for 2.6: avoid OOM at bounce buffer storm
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Using msleep() instead of HZ
Next by thread: Jörg Schilling again... [Please reply CC: [email protected]]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]