Re: [PATCH] Using msleep() instead of HZ

* Luca Falavigna <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> Ingo suggested me to forward you my patches which do use of msleep in order to
> perform short delays instead of using HZ directly.
> I already sent him some, but they are against his -RT tree.
> This is a modified patch, built against 2.6.12-rc6.
> 
> Signed-off by: Luca Falavigna <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Using msleep() instead of HZ
  - From: Luca Falavigna <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050609-2
Next by Date: Re: 2.6 kernel series have noticeable performance regression, URLs
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Using msleep() instead of HZ
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Using msleep() instead of HZ
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]