Re: PREEMPT_RT vs ADEOS: the numbers, part 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
> ok, this method should work fine. I suspect you increased the parport 
> IRQ's priority to the maximum on the PREEMPT_RT kernel, correct? Was 
> there any userspace thread on the target system (receiving the parport 
> request and sending the reply), or was it all done in a kernelspace 
> parport driver?

This is all done in kernelspace. I'll check with Kristian for the
rest. In the mean time, let me know if you have any recommendations
based on the fact that it's indeed in the kernel.

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || [email protected] || 1-866-677-4546

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux