On Sunday 12 June 2005 09:49, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>* Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think I see. Do you have a swag as to how much runtime overhead
>> using softirq's only might cause? [...]
>
>should be barely measurable for desktop workloads. For servers it
> might be significant, depending on the amount of IRQ traffic. For
> any box doing less than 2000-3000 irqs/sec it should be very small.
>
> Ingo
Chuckle, for me that would be a 'mox nix' using the english
spelling. :-) And seti made a liar out of me, it did do 7 units
yesterday.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
