* Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I see. Do you have a swag as to how much runtime overhead > using softirq's only might cause? [...] should be barely measurable for desktop workloads. For servers it might be significant, depending on the amount of IRQ traffic. For any box doing less than 2000-3000 irqs/sec it should be very small. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
- From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
- From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
- References:
- [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
- From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
- From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
- [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
- Prev by Date: Debian 2.6.8-16 kernel BUG at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:618
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix small DoS on connect() (was Re: BUG: Unusual TCP Connect() results.)
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
- Index(es):
 |