Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00

* Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think I see.  Do you have a swag as to how much runtime overhead 
> using softirq's only might cause? [...]

should be barely measurable for desktop workloads. For servers it might 
be significant, depending on the amount of IRQ traffic. For any box 
doing less than 2000-3000 irqs/sec it should be very small.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
    • From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
    • From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
    • From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
    • From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Debian 2.6.8-16 kernel BUG at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:618
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix small DoS on connect() (was Re: BUG: Unusual TCP Connect() results.)
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]