Re: hackbench: 2.6.12-rc6 vs. 2.6.12-rc6-RT-V0.7.48-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Esben Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Depends on the configuration options. If you used the same configs 
> they should be the same but if you activated PREEMPT_RT it should slow 
> things down due to the overhead of irq-threading and mutexes instead 
> of spinlocks - although I am surprised the factor is _that_ big!

one has to make sure the default debug options are disabled.  
(DEADLOCK_DETECT, PREEMPT_DEBUG, etc.) But even then there will be 
considerable overhead. Until recently, the overhead used to be even 
bigger. Note that hackbench is pretty much the worst-case for 
PREEMPT_RT: lots of locking and scheduling done and we compare the UP 
kernel to the SMP kernel in essence. (in fact PREEMPT_RT's locking is 
currently higher overhead than SMP)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux