hackbench: 2.6.12-rc6 vs. 2.6.12-rc6-RT-V0.7.48-06

Hi!

I made some test with 2.6.12-rc6-RT-V0.7.48-06 and 2.6.12-rc6 kernels.
Here is my results:

2.6.12-rc6-RT-V0.7.48-0			       2.6.12-rc6
------------------------------------			    ----------------	

./hackbench 30

1st run:  6.139					    5.110	
2nd run: 6.119					   4.946
3rd run: 6.135					    5.168

./hackbench 100

1st run:  23.254				   16.603	
2nd run: 23.481					  16.478
3rd run:  23.790				   16.387

./hackbench 130

1st run:  33.395				   21.731	
2nd run: 32.652					  21.821
3rd run:  32.517				   21.698

./hackbench 150

1st run:  89.100				   47.862	
2nd run: 39.308					  25.121
3rd run:  90.157				   25.125

It seems to me 2.6.12-rc faster than 2.6.12-rc6-RT-V0.7.48-0. It is
normal? 

thanks,

-
mg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ez az =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=FCzenetr=E9sz?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_digit=E1lis?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_al=E1=EDr=E1ssal?= van =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ell=E1tva?=

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: hackbench: 2.6.12-rc6 vs. 2.6.12-rc6-RT-V0.7.48-06
    • From: Esben Nielsen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] cciss 2.6 DMA mapping
• Next by Date: Re: DMA mapping (was Re: [PATCH] cciss 2.6; replaces DMA masks with kernel defines)
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] cciss 2.6 DMA mapping
• Next by thread: Re: hackbench: 2.6.12-rc6 vs. 2.6.12-rc6-RT-V0.7.48-06
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]